Esther M. Lofton
(Address deleted for privacy)
July 9, 2011

Mr. Barack Obama, President
United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

RE: Enforcement of the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment to The United States Constitution

Dear President Obama:

The petition from me to you, as follows:

May 19, 2011

Re: Your Letter Dated April 11, 2011

Dear Ms. Lofton:

Presiding Judge Lee Smalley Edmond asked me to respond to your letter dated April 11, 2011.

As set forth in my letter dated April 8, 2011, a clerk's judgment was entered in favor of HSBC Bank Nevada and against your son, Michael Lofton, in LASC Case No. 1OK18049 on February 18, 2011. A copy of the judgment is attached.

Concerning your request for a refund, this office can be of no assistance as you have provided insufficient details regarding the basis of your request. Accordingly, no further action will be taken on this matter and I am ordering it closed.

Very truly yours,

David S. Wesley Assistant Presiding Judge

*********************************************

Clerk’s Judgment???  There is no such document.  

Deputy Clerk Delores Odom-Stocks, is not qualified to render any court judgment. 

Deputy Clerk Delores Odom-Stocks is neither a judge, nor the judge of court of record.

It is the height of dysfunction for Deputy Clerk Delores Odom-Stocks to rule and affix her signature to infer default on my part, when Deputy Clerk Delores Odom-Stock is not qualified, and any entry of default in Los Angeles Superior Court Case 10K18049  is false.  I have a gut feeling that Deputy Clerk Delores Odom-Stocks is black like me, but who like many other black elected officials, and/or other blacks in position of responsibility, sellout the best interests of law abiding U.S. born Black people, pertaining to yours truly, the Lofton family, Carl Steaman, etc., and who are under sworn oath of office, have contempt for the U.S. Constitution, the California Constitution, and/or the rule of law.

Having been the only party to appear on January 27, 2011 in department 77 of Los Angeles Stanley Mosk Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles in Limited Liability Case#10K18049: HSBC Bank N.A. vs. Lofton, and having proven without doubt of any kind or type that (political) representation requiring execution/enforcement of the constitution and laws, specifically AMENDMENT 14, US Constitution is non-existent at the local, county, state, and federal levels of elected representation. (Los Angeles Superior Court Cases 895188, BC385899, “Theft by Court”, the Demurrer to Los Angeles Superior Court case 10K18049, and the proposed judgment order, the judge of court of record, Judge Steven Kleifield is the only qualified court official to exercise such authority.

********************************************

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

Judge

An official of the judicial branch of government with authority to decide lawsuits and preside over trials brought before the court. The term “judge” may also refer to all judicial officers, including Supreme Court justices. An applicant for appointment as a judge must have been admitted to practice law in California for at least 10 years.

NON-JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

Executive Officer/Clerk 

The Executive Officer/Clerk is responsible for the administrative supervision and control of all non-judicial activities of the Court. The Executive Officer/Clerk also serves as jury commissioner of the court. Court judges select the Executive Officer/Clerk. The Executive Officer/Clerk, under the direction of the Presiding Judge, supervises all administrative activities and personnel, coordinates all staff activities and has charge of planning and improving management methods.

*************************************************

Black’s Law Dictionary, 5^th Edition, West Publishing Company, 1981.

Signature: The act of putting one’s name at the end of an instrument to attest its validity; the name thus written.

Signed: Includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to authenticate a writing.

Judicial office: Offices which relate to the administration of justice; and which should be exercised by persons of sufficient skill and experience in the duties which appertain to them.

Judicial officer:   A judge or magistrate. The term, in the popular sense, applies generally to any officer of a court, but in the strictly legal sense applies only to an officer who determines causes between parties or renders decision in a judicial capacity. One who exercises judicial function.   A person in whom is vested authority to decide causes or exercise powers appropriate to a court.

Judicial power: “The authority exercised by that department of government which is charged with declaration of what law is and its construction. The authority vested in courts and judges, as distinguished from the executive and legislative power……”

Clerk: Officer of the court who files pleadings, motions, judgments, etc., issues process, and keeps records of court proceedings.

Signature: The act of putting one’s name at the end of an instrument to attest its validity; the name thus written.

Signed: Includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to authenticate a writing.

***********************************************************

California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19: The Legislature shall prescribe compensation for judges of courts of record.  

 A judge of a court of record may not receive the salary for the judicial office held by the judge while any cause before the judge remains pending and undetermined for 90 days after it has been submitted for decision.

The judge of court of record, Judge Stephen Kleifield, is under oath and mandated by law pursuant to ARTICLE VI, §19, to render a court decision within 90 days from January 27, 2011. As of April 26, 2011, Judge Steven J. Kleifield, pursuant to ARTICLE VI, §19, CC , must render a formal court decision for Limited Liability Case #10K18049: HSBC Bank N.A. vs. Lofton.

Sincerely,

(Hypertext is linked to testimony, correspondence, court cases, and other supportive evidence.)

Hello America,

I’m a U.S. born American citizen, and a thirty year tax paying resident in the 10^th Los Angeles City Council District, the 2^nd Los Angeles County District, and the State of California. I ‘m also a 30 year and of qualifying retirement age LADWP employee, formerly employed as a Senior Electrical Mechanic, whose LADWP utility water service has been cut off, whose electrical power was cut off until I reconnected electric service with my Mom’s assistance. Additional threats have been made by the LADWP to discontinue electric service to my residence, while my earned retirement benefits, etc., are being held hostage by the LADWP.   I hired on with the LADWP on April 16, 1979, as a Steam Plant Assistant and was terminated in good standing on March 12, 2009, minus all earned retirement benefits after over a decade of service as a Senior Electrical Mechanic on March 12, 2009. (not as a commercial truck driver as used in court to contest Superior Court Case BC 385899 by Deputy City Attorney Lisa Berger, Judge Mark Mooney, Department 68, being the judge of court of record).

On January 19, 2011, LADWP water utility workers disconnected the water meter and applied a tamper proof plug at the utility water source, without knocking on our door.   My Mom, Mrs. Esther M. Lofton contacted to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office and the LADWP water service supervisor Mrs. Tanya Franklin and was given the run around.    On Friday, January 21, 2011, I talked with Mr. Greg Williams, a water utility supervisor for the LADWP, and the result have been just as fruitless. My Mom, Mrs. Esther M. Lofton, a senior citizen, and I have been without water for toilets, bath water, drinking water, etc., and have had to resort to using a city fire hydrant or other sources for water for survival. 

2^nd District Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas has been alerted by certified mail, other correspondence, personal appearance before the LA County Board of Supervisors, and through notice of hearing in the limited liability case #10K18049 Demurrer. Mandated representation by elected officials does not exist for law abiding U.S. born Black men, women, and/or his or her siblings at the city, county, state, and federal level (Justice Clarence Thomas), no good President Barack Obama being inclusive in this reality pertaining to the absence of representative government for law abiding U.S. born blacks.  

My LADWP earned retirement being denied without cause (vested retirement not applicable), water being cut off, and long standing but unresolved Los Angeles Superior Court Case 895188, the HSBC limited liability case #10K18049 Demurrer, the most recent application for Ex Parte and accompanying proposed judgment order before Stanley Mosk Los Angeles Superior Court  Judge Steven Kleifield have yet to be granted, executed and enforced as mandated by the 14^th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article VI, Section 19, of the California Constitution. Any man or woman of less than independent means must have a source of income to provide for the necessities of life, and/or to pay off a debt owed to any creditor, such as HSBC et al.

As a law abiding taxpaying U.S. born American citizen, be it in the past or the present, I’m receiving just a fraction (BC 385899) of the unwarranted, illegal treatment, and economic sanctions that stem from the atrocities of a government seriously gone awry that my Dad, an honorably discharged disabled draftee veteran of a foreign war (WWII) Leon E. Lofton, Jr. who passed with his integrity intact, and Mom, as documented by Los Angeles Superior Court case 895188 to which the defendants have admitted guilt, yet Superior Court case 895188 has yet to be resolved.

Law abiding U.S. citizens such as my Dad, Mom, Carl Steadman, John Thompson, I, and/or others, are not supposed to be punished or subjected to such cruel and unusual punishment.

The U.S., is supposed to be in a class by itself, holding dear our U.S. Constitution, respective State Constitutions, the rule of law, and being “one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”, citizenship guarantees that have yet to be realized by my Dad, my Mom, Carl Steadman, John Thompson, I, and/or many other U.S. born blacks,  because of the contempt that our own elected Black leaders have for his or her sworn duty to respect the principles to which this nation stands.

Sincerely,

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

Judge

An official of the judicial branch of government with authority to decide lawsuits and preside over trials brought before the court. The term “judge” may also refer to all judicial officers, including Supreme Court justices. An applicant for appointment as a judge must have been admitted to practice law in California for at least 10 years.

 ****************************************************************************************************

NON-JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

The clerk can review and enter defaults and default judgments in simple cases. The Court may make an order dismissing the case and/or imposing sanctions.

Los Angeles Superior Court Cases 895188, BC385899, “Theft by Court”, the Demurrer to Los Angeles Superior Court case 10K18049, the proposed judgment order, are not simple cases or issues for any court clerk to render a court decision.  

Furthermore regarding Los Angeles Superior Court Case 10K18049 , Demurrer to 10K18049,  the proposed judgment order, neither a court clerk nor any judge of the court have the lawful right to disparage or deny mandated Constitutional protections, property rights, the rule of law, by entering a default judgment against the only party to the case who appeared in court for the scheduled January 27, 2011 date of the hearing before Judge Steven J. Kleifield.

****************************************************

What Happens If The Plaintiff Does Not Show Up For Trial Or Does Not Want To Pursue The Case?

The Court may make an order dismissing the case and/or imposing sanctions.

*********************************************************************************************

The only party to appear, regarding Los Angeles Superior Court Case 10K18049 and the Demurrer to 10K18049 on January 27, 2011, is the Defendant, Michael L. Lofton. Based upon this fact, court procedures, and the California Constitution:

(1) Having been the only party to appear on January 27, 2011 in department 77 of Los Angeles Stanley Mosk Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles where you are the judge of court of record in Limited Liability Case #10K18049: HSBC Bank N.A. vs. Lofton,

(2) Having presented a (proposed) Judgment and Order in Limited Liability Case #10K18049: HSBC Bank N.A. vs. Lofton dated January 27, 2011,

(3) Having proven without doubt of any kind or type that (political) representation requiring execution/enforcement of the constitution and laws, specifically AMENDMENT 14, US Constitution is non-existent at the local, county, state, and federal levels of elected representation. (Los Angeles Superior Court Cases 895188, BC385899, “Theft by Court”, the Demurrer to Los Angeles Superior Court case 10K18049, and the proposed judgment order.   Considering the serious nature, blatant disregard for the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, the California Constitution, etc., any judge of court of record who attempts to dismiss any one of these cases should bury his or her head in endless shame! Thus far not single judge of court of record has affixed his or her signature to any valid court document to dismiss either of these cases.

(4) Having paid the above-entitled court the required three hundred seventy dollars ($370).

California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19: The Legislature shall prescribe compensation for judges of courts of record.  

 A judge of a court of record may not receive the salary for the judicial office held by the judge while any cause before the judge remains pending and undetermined for 90 days after it has been submitted for decision.

The judge of court of record, Judge Stephen Kleifield, is under oath and mandated by law pursuant to ARTICLE VI, §19, to render a court decision within 90 days from January 27, 2011. As of April 26, 2011, Judge Steven J. Kleifield, pursuant to ARTICLE VI, §19, CC , must render a formal court decision for Limited Liability Case #10K18049: HSBC Bank N.A. vs. Lofton.

Sincerely,

Michael L. Lofton

(Hypertext is linked to testimony, correspondence, court cases, and other supportive evidence.)

Lisa Berger, Deputy City Attorney, Defendant’s Dumurrer to Complaint as per Los Angeles Superior Court Case BC 385899: 

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES: INTRODUCTION, Page 3, Lines 5 thru 7. “Under state law and federal regulations, plaintiff Michael L. Lofton is required to submit periodically to random drug testing in order to maintain his Class B vehicle license, which is required for his job.” by Deputy City Attorney Lisa Berger

 ARGUMENT: Statement of Facts, Pages 3-4, Lines 28, 1 to 2. “He holds a Class B vehicle license and is therefore required by state law and federal regulations to submit periodically to random drug testing.” by Deputy City Attorney Lisa Burger

Response: As a Senior Electrical Mechanic, a Class B vehicle license is not required for my job. I’ve been employed as a file clerk for the Veterans Administration, a Steam Plant Assistant, Electrical Craft Helper, Apprentice Electrical Repairer, Electrical Mechanic, Senior Electrical Mechanic, substitute Electrical Mechanic Supervisor, and Electrician, but never as a commercial truck driver, nor have I had the interest to be employed as a commercial truck driver. Be it past or present, I’ve yet to be employed as a commercial truck driver. As a Senior Electrical Mechanic I’m not required to drive or use vehicles that require a class B license.   Although I possess a commercial class B driver’s license, my employment duties do not require that I drive a vehicle that requires a class B driver’s license. 

Furthermore, from January 2007 until I was placed at No Shift No Pay (NSNP) and sent home on October 17, 2007, without cause, I was assigned to work at 1212 Palmetto Street, in the ESM Diagnostics section. The work performed by me, required using “Flir” infrared cameras, contact resistance, timing testing using “Vanguard Instruments Incorporated” testing equipment, and SF₆ Gas leak detection, to aid in preventive maintenance of electrical apparatus.   The results and related documentation for such testing of High Voltage switchgear, conductors, transformers, wire and cable terminations, at LADWP and other facilities, does not required a Class B vehicle license.    The work as described associated with driving to and from LADWP facilities, or other locations, does not require any more than a regular Class C driver’s license.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES: INTRODUCTION, Page 3, Lines 7 thru 12.   “On October 16, 2007, he was ordered in for a test but was unable to provide a sufficient sample. Believing it would infringe on his personal liberty if he remained long enough to comply, Mr. Lofton left without completing the test. He was thereafter notified he would have to undergo a substance abuse evaluation in order to receive the necessary clearance from the Department of Transportation ["DOT"] to return to work. Because he was unwilling to do so, he was placed on an unpaid status.” by Deputy City Attorney Lisa Berger

Response: On October 16, 2007, I reported to the LADWP Truesdale Training Center as directed by my immediate Supervisor, for a refresher Qualified Electrical Worker that began at 7:00 A.M. and ended at 3:00 P.M.  At approximately 9:30 A.M. I received a call from my immediate supervisor to report to Maximed Medical Center at the conclusion of the 3:00 P.M., QEW refresher training of October 16, 2007. At 3:30 P.M. I arrived at the Maximed Medical Center. I provided Maximed Medical Center personnel with two separate urine samples, the last sample at the conclusion of the work day, which ended a 4:00 P.M.   Both samples provided, according to Maximed Medical Center personnel were not of sufficient volume.  

 “U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance, Best Practices for DOT Random Drug and Alcohol Testing

 Part V. Testing:

 D. What must employees do when notified of a random test?

“When an employee is notified, he or she must proceed immediately to the collection site. Contrary to the urban legends circulating among some employees, immediately does not mean two hours. Immediately means that after notification, all the employee’s actions must lead to an immediate specimen collection. Why? For the integrity of the testing process.”

There was plenty of time for the 3 hour DOT test to be performed during the normal scheduled work day of 7:00 A.M. through 4:00 PM, so that my body could produce sufficient urine, and so that it would not infringe upon my personal rights. The two urine samples provided were no collected under mandatory random sampling conditions as required by law.   The call from my immediate supervisor for DOT testing at 9:30 A. M. to report for testing after 3:00 P.M. leaves a six hour time difference between the initial directive and the actual urine sampling provided between 3:30 P.M and 4:30 P.M., which is in violation of random test DOT procedures. Finally, I had a prescheduled Tungsten Inert Gas Aluminum welding class, on this same date, from 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. that I paid for at Los Angeles Trade Tech College. 

This being said, the LADWP/DOT rights end where my rights begin, meaning remaining at the Maximed Medical Center after normal shift, is definitely an unnecessary intrusion on my personal liberty and property rights.

U.S. Constitution, 14^th AMENDMENT: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. 

California Constitution, Article 1, Section 1: “All men are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness”.

 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 2: “All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the pubhc good may require it”.

 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 3. “The State of California is an inseparable part of the American Union, and the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land”.

 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 10: The people" shall have the right to freely assemble together to consult for the common good, to instruct their Representatives, and to petition Legislature for redress of grievances”.

 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 13: “In criminal prosecutions, in any court whatever, the party accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial; to have the process of the court to compel the attendance of witnesses in his behalf, and to appear and defend , in person and with counsel.  No person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense; nor be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law…..”.

 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 22: “The provisions of the Constitution are mandatory and prohibitory, unless by express words they are declared to be otherwise”.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES: INTRODUCTION, Page 3, Lines 14 thru 20: “Mr. Lofton fails to state a cause of action against defendant Antonio Villaraigosa. He has alleged no facts indicating Mayor Villaraigosa personally participated in Mr. Lofton being required to take a drug test or in his being placed on unpaid status. A public official cannot be held liable for the acts and omissions of another person. Moreover, the allegations of the complaint establish as a matter of law that the actions complained of were taken in order to comply with state and federal regulations, for the purpose of promoting the safety of employees and the public. A public employee may not be held liable for enforcing the law.” by Deputy City Attorney Lisa Berger

Response: L.A. City Charter, Sec. 215. Oath of Office: Every officer provided for in the Charter shall, before entering upon the discharge of the duties of office, take the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California and the Charter of the City of Los Angeles, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of (here inserting the name of the office…Mayor, City Councilperson, other government officials, etc.) according to the best of my ability.”

L.A. City Charter 1, Sec. 209: Code of Conduct of Elected Officials; Censure. All elected officials of the City are expected to conform to the highest standards of personal and professional conduct. The Council shall have the power to adopt, by a two-thirds vote, a resolution of censure with respect to any member of the Council whose actions constitute a gross failure to meet such high standards, even if the action does not constitute a ground for removal from office under the Charter.

 L.A. City Charter, Sec. 230.   Mayor. Except as otherwise provided in the Charter, management authority shall be vested in the Mayor who shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the City and shall devote his or her entire time to the duties of the office. The Mayor shall execute and uphold all laws and ordinances of the City.

 L.A. City Charter, Sec. 231. Powers and Duties. The Mayor shall have the power and duty to: (a) exercise management authority over all departments, agencies and appointed offices of the City ….”.

 ARGUMENT: Statement of Facts, Pages 3-4, Lines 13 thru 15. “Concerned about his right against self-incrimination, Mr. Lofton refused to participate in the evaluation and was placed on unpaid status pending DOT clearance.” By Deputy City Attorney Lisa Berger

Response:

California Constitution, Article 1, Section 13: “………nor be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law…..”.

 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 22: “The provisions of the Constitution are mandatory and prohibitory, unless by express words they are declared to be otherwise”.

 Part V. Testing:

 D. What must employees do when notified of a random test?

“When an employee is notified, he or she must proceed immediately to the collection site. Contrary to the urban legends circulating among some employees, immediately does not mean two hours. Immediately means that after notification, all the employee’s actions must lead to an immediate specimen collection. Why? For the integrity of the testing process.”

Since I do not have a history of drug and alcohol use, and the LADWP’s medical records for Michael L. Lofton, employee #532091, for past and present DOT tests are all negative, with good reason I refused to submit to evaluation by any substance abuse professional as a condition to remain employed.   To be denied the right to work, to be placed at NSNP without proof, and/or to be subjected to any other unwarranted punishment without proof that you are in fact an alcohol or drug substance abuser, is a serious Constitutional violation.

The failure of IBEW local 18, the failure of the Civil Service Commission, specifically Sylvia Drew Ivie, the failure of Los Angeles City Councilman Herb Wesson to correct the wrongs committed by the LADWP that have resulted in loss of property, gainfully employment rights, blatant defamation of my good character without proof, holding the earned retirement benefits, other earned benefits, of Michael L. Lofton, a 30 year and of qualifying age LADWP employee, Threats, cutting off LADWP supplied electricity and water while holding retirement and other earned LADWP retirement benefits as hostage, and most importantly unresolved Los Angeles Superior Court Case 895188 where the defendants have admitted guilt….. left no other recourse but to file Los Angeles Superior Court case BC 385899, and the Demurr and proposed judgment order to Los Angeles Superior Court Case 10K18049, where there are no issues in dispute.

Page 3, Lines 12-13. “Mr. Lofton now contends he is being denied his right to employment because of his race.” by Deputy City Attorney Lisa Berger

 “The property which every man has in his own labour, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of a poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper without injury to his neighbour, is a plain violation of this most sacred property. It is a manifest encroachment upon the just liberty both of the workman, and of those who might be disposed to employ him. As it hinders the one from working at what he thinks proper, so it hinders the aothersa from employing whom they think proper. To judge whether he is fit to be employed, may surely be trusted to the discretion of the employers whose interest it so much concerns. The affected anxiety of the law–giver lest they should employ an improper person, is evidently as impertinent as it is oppressive.” by Adam Smith, Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence Vol. 2a An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Vol. 1, CHAPTER X: Of Wages and Profit in the different Employments of Labour and Stock (paragraph 591)

………To deprive an individual of the right to gainful employment eventually and inevitably deprives him of rights the average citizen takes for granted; the right to acquire, possess, his or her property. This impairs the contract that exists between the citizen and his government. A citizen of less than independent means must have work to acquire the necessities of life. 

When any U.S. citizen(s) is egregiously violated by the atrocities of a government seriously gone awry, the citizen, the legal immigrant, has the right to petition his or her elected official for redress of grievances. This duty to respect the lawful rights of the law abiding, namely Michael L. Lofton, my dad, Leon E. Lofton, Jr., an honorably discharged disabled draftee combat infantry veteran of WWII who passed in 2003 with his integrity intact, my Mom, Mrs. Esther M. Lofton, the entire Mr. and Mrs. Leon E. Lofton, Jr. family, Carl Steadman, etc., have resulted in substantial harm, losses and/or very destructive, which are the basis for this and other court cases. 

“The Honorable Robert Finerman issued the following order to Elaine Reed and her supervisor, Mr. Underwood: "The parents are not guilty of any criminal violation; the children are not guilty of any criminal violation. My order to you is for an abode and the necessities of life." The Lofton minors remained in the custody and under the control of the Probation Department of the County of Los Angeles until June 1968”.  (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

“The Honorable Leopoldo G. Sanchez issued the following order: to officials and agents of DPSS: “The parents are not guilty of any criminal violation; the children are not guilty of any criminal violation. My order to you is for an abode and the necessities of life." (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

 “Tyranny, not the rule of law, reigns in inner-city Los Angeles. Tyranny is arbitrary or despotic government; the severe and autocratic exercise of sovereign power, either vested constitutionally in one ruler, or usurped by him by breaking down the division and distribution of governmental powers.” (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

“The tyrannical stranglehold has yet to be removed from the life of Carl A. Steadman Jr. whose employment opportunities have been reduced after "a long train of abuses" by officials and agents of Los Angeles County. LA County government who violated him to cover-up for lies by two Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriffs, Hanson (#428366) and Marshall (#412547), one black the other white.  As result of a minor traffic accident in the Los Angeles area August 10, 1998 Carl A. Steadman was convicted and fined in case #8IW7573, Inglewood Municipal Court of reckless driving even though the record (Traffic Collision Report #1998080109) found the other driver violated Vehicle Code (VC) 22106: unsafe backing. Carl A Steadman Jr. was convicted and fined in case #8CU01940 in Culver City Municipal Court of violating Penal Code (PC) Sections 242/243, a battery merely for pursuing an escaping driver to obtain information required by California Rules of the Road. Lies from the sheriffs to highway patrolman C. Jackson (#13701) precipitated the recommendation that "a complaint be filed against P-2

 ( Steadman) for 14601.1 (a) VC-driving on a suspended license.” (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

”Councilman Tom La Bonge and Councilman Bernard Parks, City Councilman, 8^th District, City of Los Angeles each received a copy of the booklet titled Theft by Court, authored by Esther M. Lofton, detailing a level of corruption in local courts damaging the life of an inner city youth. The cost of the publication borne by Michael L. Lofton, who gained nothing thereby, brought no response of any kind from LA Councilman Parks.”  (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

“A petition dated 06-08-99 signed by Esther M. Lofton, forwarded by U.S. mail to 8^th District Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas, in behalf of Carl A. Steadman Jr. who resides in the 8^th Council District, City of Los was returned to the sender, unopened. Judgment and sentencing order, case #8CU01940, in violation of PC Section 242/243 records that $750 of the $800 fine went to a county fund (2^nd district) instead of to (scratched out) appointed counsel”.  (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

 "Insisting on honesty as the only policy, the supreme ruled Wednesday that public employees can be punished for lying, even when they merely deny an accusation that later turns out to be true”.

 “ …….Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. 'An employee who is asked about possible wrongdoing has only two legal choices: Tell the truth or say nothing”. (LA Times, January 22, 1998.)

“Today Tyranny should be the cry from residents of inner city Los Angeles who are not only taxed without representation from their own kind to an extent not experienced by colonists prior to 1776, a form of tyranny  that grossly violates the constitution and laws and mirrors an unfathomable level of indecency among civilized individuals” (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

“While inner city officials ignore the rights of their constituents, with impunity, an atmosphere that breeds contempt for the law, illegal aliens see this as an opportunity to slip into the country fully aware that people that have been treated shabbily in their own land are less likely to offer them opposition.” (Source Fact, truth, and Cases 895188, BC 385899)

Unlike Deputy City Attorney Lisa Berger who is not sworn under oath to serve the U.S. citizens, all elected officials are sworn under oath and mandated by law to uphold the U.S. Constitution, the California Constitution, etc., in behalf of law abiding citizens such as honorably discharged disabled WWII U.S. Army Veteran Leon E. Lofton, Jr., Mrs. Esther M. Lofton (895188), the Lofton family (895188), Michael L. Lofton (895188, BC 385899, the Demurrer to 10K18049, proposed Judgment Order), Carl Steadman (Theft by Court), honorably discharged Iraq War Veteran Sgt. Anita Shaw and family, etc., whose son Jamiel Shaw was murdered by a felonious criminal illegal/undocumented immigrant, etc. The primary failure is with elected black leaders at the local (Los Angeles City 8^th District Councilman Bernard Parks, Los Angeles 10^th District Councilman Herb Wesson), county (Los Angeles County 2^nd District Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas, former LA County 2^nd District Supervisor Yvonne B. Burke), state, and federal level (President Barack Obama), former Congresswoman Diane Watson, Congresswoman Karen Bass, Congresswoman Maxine “Kerosene” Waters, etc. ) U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, multiple members of the Congressional Black Caucus) of government who have contempt for the Constitutional rights of law abiding U.S. citizens, who are U.S. born and black.

……since this is supposed to be “One Nation Under God, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for All”, to which government is instituted for the protection of its’ citizens.

Sincerely,

January 31, 2011

RE: "Taxation Without Competent Representation" in Los Angeles County and beyond, C-10 Licensing renewal fees due, etc.

Dear Governor Brown:

I'm a law abiding U.S. citizen, who is forced to pay taxes to a government that is not instituted to protect the Constitutional rights of law abiding U.S. citizens, namely due to the disregard that elected officials at the local, county, state, and federal level have for the "rule of law".

It is hoped that you take this into account as it pertains to expecting average citizens such as I, to support any tax increase to reduce the deficit in the State of California.

Sincerely,

Michael L. Lofton

*************************************

The Black Community's new Slave Masters are its’ own incompetent Black Leaders, “Brain Dead” Leaders Such as President Barack Obama, A.K.A “The Magic Negr@”, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, 2^nd District Los Angeles County Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas, 10^th District Los Angeles City Councilman Herb Wesson, 8^th District Los Angeles City Councilman Bernard Parks, the Democratic Party, especially the dysfunctional Democratic Congressional Black Caucus, and other black government employees,  who have contempt for the “rule of Law”, his or her oath of Office, the California Constitution, other State Constitutions, the U.S. Constitution, etc.

(Hypertext is linked to testimony, correspondence, court cases, and other supportive evidence.)

Supreme Court rejects damages for innocent man who spent 14 years on death row, In a 5-4 ruling, justices overturn a jury verdict awarding $14 million to John Thompson, who had sued then-New Orleans Dist. Atty. Harry Connick Sr. because prosecutors hid a blood test that would have proved his innocence in a murder case.

by David G. Savage, Washington Bureau, March 30, 2011, Reporting from Washington

John Thompson spent 14 years on death row because prosecutors had hidden a blood test that would have exonerated him. A $14-million judgment against New Orleans prosecutors was overturned by the Supreme Court. (Patrick Semansky, Associated Press / March 30, 2011)

A bitterly divided Supreme Court on Tuesday tossed out a jury verdict won by a New Orleans man who spent 14 years on death row and came within weeks of execution because prosecutors had hidden a blood test and other evidence that would have proven his innocence.

The 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas shielded the New Orleans district attorney's office from being held liable for the mistakes of its prosecutors. The evidence of their misconduct did notprove "deliberate indifference" on the part of then-Dist. Atty. Harry Connick Sr., Thomas said.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg emphasized her disapproval by reading her dissent in the courtroom, saying the court was shielding a city and its prosecutors from "flagrant" misconduct that nearly cost an innocent man his life.

"John Thompson spent 14 years isolated on death row before the truth came to light," she said. He was innocent of the crimes that sent him to prison and prosecutors had "dishonored" their obligation to present the true facts to the jury, she said.

In the past, the high court has absolved trial prosecutors from any and all liability for the cases they bring to court. The key issue in the case of Connick vs. John Thompson was whether the district attorney could be held liable for a pattern of wrongdoing in his office and for his failure to see to it that his prosecutors followed the law.

In 1999, when all his appeals had failed on his conviction for the murder of a hotel executive, Thompson was scheduled to be put to death. But a private investigator hired by his lawyer found a blood test in the police lab that showed the man wanted for a related carjacking had type B blood, while Thompson's was type O.

Thompson had been charged with and convicted of an attempted carjacking near the Superdome as a prelude to charging him with the unsolved murder of a hotel executive.

The newly revealed blood test spared Thompson's life, and a judge ordered a new trial on the murder charge that had sent him to death row. His new defense lawyers found other evidence that had been hidden, including eyewitnesses reports. Bystanders reported seeing a man who was 6 feet tall with close-cropped hair running away holding a gun. Thompson was 5 feet 8 and had a bushy Afro.

With the new eyewitness reports and other evidence that pointed to another man as the killer, Thompson was quickly acquitted of all the charges in a second trial. He won $14 million in damages in a civil suit against the district attorney.

In rejecting the judgment, Justice Thomas described the case as a "single incident" in which mistakes were made. He said Thompson did not prove a pattern of similar violations that would justify holding the city's government liable for the wrongdoing. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Samuel A. Alito Jr. joined to form the majority.

However, Thompson's lawyers showed that at least four prosecutors knew about the hidden blood test. They also showed evidence of other, similar cases in New Orleans in which key evidence was concealed from defense lawyers.

david.savage@latimes.com

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

*************************************************

Supreme Court Justice Oath of Office: "I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.  So help me God."

U.S. Constitution,

The Preamble: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Article III - The Judicial Branch, Section 1 - Judicial powers: The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Article VI, Debts, Supremacy and Oaths: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in …… shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding

Bill of Rights:

Amendment IV, Search and Seizure:  The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V, Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings:   No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VIII, Cruel and Unusual Punishment:  Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted

Amendment XIV, Citizenship Rights: 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.  No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

****************************************************

Esther M. Lofton

March 30, 2011

Letters to the Editor

L.A. Times

202 W. First (1st) Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Dear Sir:

What black, especially male, needs another enemy when he has someone like Justice Clarence Thomas to deliver a 5-4 decision (which he supports without equivocation of any kind or type) to shield the New Orleans District attorney's office for being held liable for...mistakes (Supreme Court overturns verdict against prosecutors, L. A. Times, 03-30-11, p. A11)... Isn't that what courts are for...to hold others liable for wrongs committed? Where did he learn his type of law, in Africa or from President Barack Obama?

This man, John Thomas, spent 14 years on death row because of this conviction. Like former speaker of the Assembly of the State of California, Jesse Unruh said, "These policy makers should get the thrill of their policymaking". I cannot possibly imagine what it was like for Mr. Thomas during those 14 years where even assuming the world around me had grown mad seemed comforting.

But I do have a question for law-abiding people of California and of the United States of America, How long must we, the most politically weak Americans, endure representation that's killing us, a type of representation that precipitated the birth of this nation?

IMPEACH...FIRE, JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS!!!.. NOW!!!

Sincerely,

Mrs. Esther M. Lofton

***************************************************

Above all, more has to be done by those who have the means in our own community, and the expertise to hold our elected officials accountable to the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, any respective State Constitution, so that Black men and women facing prison have a fair trial, anyone who serves time for a any crime, any offense, and/or a felonious offense not committed has competent representation so that the government pays a price for violating the Constitutional rights of
the innocent.

Finally, more must be to remove elected officials who are incompetent from a position of influence, to disbar lawyers who are incompetent, and/or to remove incompetent judges who have contempt for the rule of law, and the Constitution, in the "inner-city", primarily the Black community, the community where "Unequal Justice and Protection Under the Law" and Disregard for Constitution is the most
deplorable.

Here again, our own Black lawyers must step up to the plate here, because it is not in the best interest of Hispanic, Caucasian, Korean, etc., etc., attorneys to protect the Constitutional rights of law abiding U.S. born Black men, women, and/or his or her siblings.

"He or She who bears the cross wears the crown" also applies to your
own specific community!

How well I know this to be the case.  Due to the failure of our own elected Black leaders and civil lawyers to step up to the plate to protect the Constitutional rights of the law abiding in the Black community, Los Angeles Superior Court Case 895188, BC385899, Demur to, and Judgment Order in response to 10K18049, etc., remain unresolved inspite of serious atrocities on the part of egregious corruption government in Los Angeles County. 

Black men and women who face such music, such as yours truly, have to face it alone, "in pro persona", and/or with the support of the needle in the haystack few people like my Mom, who truly step up to the plate towards this end.

Sincerely,

Michael L. Lofton

Play by the rules by respecting law as court documented by each of these examples:

1.       An honorably discharged disabled and draftee Veteran of a Foreign War (WWII), specifically my Dad (Los Angeles Superior Court Case 895188), where the defendants have admitted guilt and there are no issues in dispute.

2.    My Mom, Mrs. Esther M. Lofton (Los Angeles Superior Court Case 895188, Demur to Los Angeles Superior Court Case 10K18049) the defendants have admitted guilt and there are no issues in dispute.

3.    Yours Truly,  Michael Lofton, (Los Angeles Superior BC 385899), whose good name has been maligned (perjured testimony of Deputy City Attorney Lisa Burger and the lies and bull crap by LADWP supervision never made of court record in rebuttal to BC 385899), lawful right to work damaged without good cause, and be denied, deprived, and/or cheated out of earned property (retirement and other benefits) by agents and officials of government. Article 1, Section 7, of the California Constitution states: " A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws...." and Article 1, Section 26 states: " The provisions of the constitution are mandatory and prohibitory, unless by express words they are declared to be otherwise". Have your electric (restored now because I reconnected power myself) and water utilities cut off (no water since January 19, 2011) by the LADWP while the LADWP holds earned property without good cause.   The LADWP continues to hold and/or attempt to cheat, Michael L. Lofton, a better than 30 year and of age 57 LADWP out of earned retirement benefits.

4.    The Mr. and Mrs. Leon E. and Esther M. Lofton family broken up for profit without good cause. Neither of my parents and/or not a one of my sisters,  brothers and/or I have been found to be criminal, insane, and/or unfit in any court jurisdiction within the United States of America. (Los Angeles Superior Court Cases 895188, BC 385899, etc.

5.     Jailed without cause, “Squatter Arrest” article, as published by the Los Angeles “Yellow Journal” Sentinel. Not a single LA Sentinel news reporter or agent witnessed this arrest. Furthermore, even though my Dad, Mom, Sister Verna, and I, served time in jail, there was no court arraignment, and we were not faced by our accusers in any court jurisdiction. There is a distinct difference between truth and fact (Los Angeles Superior Court Cases 895188, BC 385899, etc) and the erroneous article published by the Los Angeles Sentinel. To date the Los Angeles Sentinel has yet to publish the truth.

6.    Carl Steadman, a law abiding Black man jailed, fined without good cause by rogue police officers, and unethical court and elected officials. Theft by Court details how an innocent Black man, specifically Carl Steadman, is involved in a minor traffic accident, to where Carl Steadman is the victim,victimized by another driver cited for illegal backing, as documented by the actual traffic collision report 1998080109 and Vehicle Code 22106.  The female perpetrator leaves the scene of the accident, to commit felony hit and run, both the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, the California Highway Patrol,  Culver City Police Department, and former Inglewood Municipal Court, are fully aware of  Carl Steadman's innocence, yet blatant fraud on the part of government and the Los Angeles County Court system frees a felony hit and run driver, and illegally and unwarrantedly convicts, jails and fines, Carl Steadman, of battery, reckless driving, driving with a suspended license,  etc. (Inglewood Municipal Court Case #8IW7573). 

…….while felonious illegal immigrants from Mexico, El Salvador, Somali, Jamaica, Haiti, Kenya, Trinidad, etc., etc., get a free pass, use fraudulent documents to hold jobs reserved for U.S. citizens and legal immigrants. ( U.S. Department of Justice Department, the NAACP defend felonious illegal immigrants at the expense of the rights of law abiding U.S. citizens and police officers such as, former officer Prince George’s County Officer Stephanie Mohr.)

1.    Brain dead Black elected officials and/or Elected officials at the City level (Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles City Councilman Herb Wesson, Los Angeles City Councilman Bernard Parks), County level (2^nd District Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas, former 2^nd District Supervisor Yvonne B. “Brentwood” Burke)  State level (Attorney General Kamala Harris) and Federal levels (President Barack Obama, Congresswoman Karen Bass, former Congresswoman Diane Watson, such as  ignore, play games of deceit, are treasonous and truly a disgrace to the essence of what it means to be an elected official, promote amnesty or the Dream Act for felonious illegal immigrants, play the “race card” and/or join the ranks of the perpetrators when petitioned for redress regarding very serious atrocities of government as specified in 1 thru 7).

…….. play by the rules by respecting law and as documented above, and as a law abiding U.S. born Black Veteran of a foreign War, Black man, woman, or child, you are still treated as if you were criminal. Slim chance that the average taxpaying resident, such as myself, would be interested in agreeing to any further tax increase as proposed by California Governor Jerry Brown, to reduce California’s billion dollar deficit!

*******************************************************************************************

Michael L. Lofton

(address deleted for privacy)

February 26, 2011

Mr. Mitchell T.G. Graye, President     & CEO

Great West Life & Annuity Insurance Company

Corporate Headquarters

8615 E. Orchard Road

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

ATTENTION: Plan Administrator/Trustee, Great West Retirement Services, P.O. Box 173764; Denver, CO 80217-3764

            RE: Institutional responsibility to the constitution and laws

                    of the United States of America

Dear Mr. Graye:

            I come to you as a better than thirty (30)-year employee of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP). One of the divisions over which Great West Life & Annuity Insurance Company has exercised authority since 1940, is Great West Retirement Services a subsidiary, and the City of Los Angeles Deferred Compensation Plan.  I am forced to withdraw a portion of savings from my LADWP Deferred Compensation account because:

1.  The LADWP continues to hold and/or attempt to cheat me out of earned retirement benefits due a better than 30 year and of qualifying age LADWP employee. Since January 19, 2011, I have been without water because LADWP water utility workers removed the water utility meter at my residence, and inserted a tamper-proof plug at the utility water supply source.   The LADWP has cut off water to my residence while holding all my earned retirement benefits as hostage. 
2. Elected officials and/or government employees in the City and County of Los Angeles have no regard for the “rule of law”, the California, Article 1, Section 1, and U.S. Constitutions. 14^th AMENDMENT, USC, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. The total absence of mandated representation in the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, and/or the State of California amounts to “Black Code Law Enforcement”.
3. The local City of Los Angeles Deferred Compensation Plan Administrator(s), namely Henry Victor, (213) 978-1601, will not sign and forward the completed application that I submitted, which impedes the ability for me to receive the (distribution amount deleted for privacy) net distribution from the (fund name deleted for privacy) that I need for my survival.

      Since the local City of Los Angeles Deferred Compensation Plan Administrator(s), 200 N. Spring St., Room 867, Los Angeles, CA 90012, (213) 978-1617, have failed to protect my property rights, I now resubmit the Distribution/Direct Rollover Request Governmental 457(b) Plan application submitted and dated February 20, 2011, directly to the Great Western Retirement Services Corporate Headquarters, for immediate approval.

Sincerely,

Michael Lofton

Three Enclosures:

1.    January 5, 2011, Letter to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa

2.    February 15, 2011, Testimony to LA County Board of Supervisors

3.    January 31, 2011, Letter to Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr.

“Herb Wesson is President Obama’s Partner in Los Angeles…. Wesson’s work created 23,000 new jobs and won him the endorsement of both the Los Angeles County of Labor Federation and the Democratic Party……My Job is Jobs” mailer promoted by incumbent LA City Councilman Herb Wesson and President Barack Obama

http://www.lamar.com/Contact

Attention:   Lamar Advertizing, Company Inc., , etal

"The most dangerous place to be for an African-American is in the womb."

You should have held your ground.  The statistics alone should have been sufficient to take a stand against Reverend Al  Sharpton, no good President Obama, and the like.  The record does reflect that more than any other ethnic group more Black children are being killed or maimed, more Black families are being broken up……….

…………many of this being done by the sleaze and greed of the Black middleclass to make a profit at the expense of law abiding Black families, and/or liberals who do not give a rat’s @ss about the Black community.

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-352814

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-178499

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-45488

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-278743

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-265276

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-182700

http://ceyseau.net/files/Placing_Minors_including_infants_on_probation.pdf

http://ceyseau.net/files/THE_SENTINEL_IS_A_YELLOW_JOURNAL.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZRJCs34g0k

Sell Out pseudo leaders, sleazy individuals, no good poverty pimps, and egregiously incompetent individuals,  in a Reverend Al Sharpton, President Barack Obama, multiple members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Liberal Democrats, Planned Parenthood Inc., etc., who promote all the above and below, have done more harm to the Black community than the KKK, Jim Crow, etc., etc., have done throughout the history of the vestibule of slavery of years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OcJmbz9lDQ

http://ceyseau.net/files/The_Real_Uncle_Tom_s_.pdf

http://ceyseau.net/files/Foster_Care_and_the_Department_of_Children_s_Services_and_my_experience.pdf

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-265276

http://againstallodds.blogtownhall.com/

http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2011/01/18/black-farmers-betrayed-by-congressional-black-caucus/

http://uhurunews.com/video/play?resource_name=beyond-obama-and-the-black-misleadership-class-glen-ford-video#

http://deadwiler.blogtownhall.com/

http://onetime.blogtownhall.com/

http://whoneedsahypocrit.blogtownhall.com/

.....And Lenny, There Are Many Other Black People Who Listen to Rush Limbaugh Too!

Just Proves Liberals, President Obama, Al Sharton, and Liberal Democrats are not Fit to Lead Black America!

Sincerely.

Michael L. Lofton